Legal Reason: The Use of Analogy in Legal Argument Review

Legal Reason: The Use of Analogy in Legal Argument
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Professor Weinreb's description of the analogical nature of legal reasoning will be immediately convincing to any experienced lawyer, and his defense of analogy against its academic detractors is equally persuasive. Unlike a great deal of trendy "interdisciplinary" scholarship, Weinreb is sure-footed and effective in his use of psychological research into analogical thought, and he is equally sophisticated in handling the jurisprudential issues. The book is written with the clarity and simplicity of a true master. This is a must read for anyone interested in how lawyers and judges think ... and should think.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Legal Reason: The Use of Analogy in Legal Argument

Legal Reason describes and explains the process of analogical reasoning, which is the distinctive feature of legal argument. It challenges the prevailing view, urged by Edward Levi, Cass Sunstein, Richard Posner and others, which regards analogical reasoning as logically flawed or as a defective form of deductive reasoning. Lloyd Weinreb reveals that it is the same as the reasoning used routinely everyday--derived from the innate human capacity to recognize the general in the particular, on which thought itself depends.Moreover, the use of analogical reasoning is dictated by the nature of law, which requires the application of rules to particular facts.

Buy NowGet 20% OFF

Click here for more information about Legal Reason: The Use of Analogy in Legal Argument

0 comments:

Post a Comment